英文字典中文字典


英文字典中文字典51ZiDian.com



中文字典辞典   英文字典 a   b   c   d   e   f   g   h   i   j   k   l   m   n   o   p   q   r   s   t   u   v   w   x   y   z       







请输入英文单字，中文词皆可：


请选择你想看的字典辞典：
单词字典翻译
overthwart查看　overthwart　在百度字典中的解释百度英翻中〔查看〕
overthwart查看　overthwart　在Google字典中的解释Google英翻中〔查看〕
overthwart查看　overthwart　在Yahoo字典中的解释Yahoo英翻中〔查看〕

安装中文字典英文字典查询工具!


中文字典英文字典工具:
选择颜色:
输入中英文单字

































































英文字典中文字典相关资料:


  • authentication - How to achieve non-repudiation? - Information Security . . .
    Legally, non-repudiation is about the actions of a human A court is going to be looking for evidence that a human (e g , Grandpa) assented to the terms of the contract transaction The cryptographic schemes cannot achieve that They can only show that some computer performed some action Cryptographers like to assume that the computer acts as an agent of the human and the computer's actions
  • What is the difference between authenticity and non-repudiation?
    Non-repudiation is an active attempt to creat artifacts which may be used against an identified person who is denying that they are the origin of a communication or action The artifacts are identity, authentication of the identity, and something connecting a communication or action to the identity
  • tls - Why does HTTPS not support non-repudiation? - Information . . .
    In short: non-repudiation makes the protocol and the necessary infrastructure more complex and might not be even wanted in many cases TLS therefore sticks with protecting the communication only, which is enough for most use cases of TLS If non-repudiation is actually wanted or required (and often it is not) it can be added separately
  • What is Non-Repudiation of content? How can we combat it?
    "Non-repudiation" is a legal concept which means that you cannot successfully claim not being the source of a given piece of data Laws for that vary quite a lot around the World, and they tend to change over time, too One powerful tool for non-repudiation is digital signatures Digital signatures do not provide non-repudiation immediately, no
  • Is non-repudiation automatically proven, given the other three tenets . . .
    Generally speaking non-repudiation is an anti-feature Rather than trying to provide that, provide repudiation - reject orders you cannot show are probably valid, and ensure you have enough audit trail to investigate disputed orders - so that's accurate times, web logs, IP addresses, and so forth If the IP address is in China, but they were not, chances are they didn't place the order: You
  • Does SSL TLS provide non-repudiation service?
    TLS does not provide non-repudiation TLS is a transport layer protocol, that helps to protect the data that flows from one point to another You can authenticate hosts with certificates or even a user with a client certificate However, non-repudiation means you can prove that a specific person received a message or is the author of a message
  • Non-repudiation in Exchange Outlook without Digital Signatures
    This setup does not provide non-repudiation Non-repudiation is very challenging to achieve, and based on what I am hearing, you are nowhere near it Based on your description, you're not going to be able to prove the validity of the emails through technical arguments alone You will have to use non-technical arguments You might find other
  • Difference between non-repudiation and plausible deniability
    There are situations in which you want non-repudiation and there are situations in which you would want plausible deniability Likewise, there are situations in which you would want non-repudiation on some aspects but plausible deniability on others For example, let's say you've made a deal with someone and want to sign a contract with them
  • network - Does signing my e-mail with DKIM imply non-repudiation for . . .
    DKIM does not provide non-repudiation or confidentiality such as PGP GPG or S MIME It is primarily a means of authentication of the originator of the message (most likely at the domain company level and not individual), and (to my knowledge) the most practical use is chiefly for spam phishing prevention
  • account security - Non-repudiation of customer data - Information . . .
    Also, some kinds of data might not need a strong cryptographic proven non-repudiation at all, i e if an address was successfully used to communicate with the customer it is likely that it actually belongs to the customer even if not proven in a cryptographic way So an answer would also depend on the kind of data, of the legal framework





中文字典-英文字典  2005-2009