英文字典中文字典


英文字典中文字典51ZiDian.com



中文字典辞典   英文字典 a   b   c   d   e   f   g   h   i   j   k   l   m   n   o   p   q   r   s   t   u   v   w   x   y   z       







请输入英文单字，中文词皆可：


请选择你想看的字典辞典：
单词字典翻译
mocking查看　mocking　在百度字典中的解释百度英翻中〔查看〕
mocking查看　mocking　在Google字典中的解释Google英翻中〔查看〕
mocking查看　mocking　在Yahoo字典中的解释Yahoo英翻中〔查看〕

安装中文字典英文字典查询工具!


中文字典英文字典工具:
选择颜色:
输入中英文单字

































































英文字典中文字典相关资料:


  • unit testing - What is Mocking? - Stack Overflow
    The purpose of mocking types is to sever dependencies in order to isolate the test to a specific unit Stubs are simple surrogates, while mocks are surrogates that can verify usage A mocking framework is a tool that will help you generate stubs and mocks
  • Whats the difference between faking, mocking, and stubbing?
    Mock only when using a mocking framework like Moq for example because it doesn't seem right to refer to it as a Fake when it's being created with new Mock<ISomething>() - while you can technically use a mocking framework to create Stubs or Fakes, it just seems kind of dumb to call it that in this situation - it has to be a Mock Fake for
  • unit testing - Mocking using Moq in c# - Stack Overflow
    This is why I love what any mocking framework enforces you to do - write decoupled code In your example, the ProductBusiness class is tightly coupled with the ProductDataAccess class You could decouple it using (like most of the answers suggest) dependency injection
  • What is the purpose of mock objects? - Stack Overflow
    The mock will indicate whether what really happens differs from what is supposed to happen A custom mock object could be created from scratch for each test case to execute the expected behavior for that test case, but a mocking framework strives to allow such a behavior specification to be clearly and easily indicated directly in the test case
  • c# - Mocking a method to throw an exception (moq), but otherwise act . . .
    Basically, this is the wrong approach - you should be mocking the IFileConnection, and newing up a Transfer object in your test, and passing the stubs in - they're not mocks! Depending on the permutation of behaviour of those mocks, your test will cover different parts of the code Look at code coverage in something like Rider or Visual Studio
  • What is a mock and when should you use it? - Stack Overflow
    There are mocking frameworks that allow you to create these objects on the fly and in essence allow you to say something like: Make me an object with a method foo that takes an int and returns a bool When I pass 0, it should return true Then you can test the code that uses foo(), to make sure it reacts appropriately
  • Mocking member variables of a class using Mockito
    Here is how I augment mocking with reflection First, I created a TestUtils class that contains many helpful utils including these reflection methods Reflection access is a bit wonky to implement each time I created these methods to test code on projects that, for one reason or another, had no mocking package and I was not invited to include it
  • python - Mocking __init__ () for unittesting - Stack Overflow
    Instead of mocking, you could simply subclass the database class and test against that: class TestingDatabaseThing(DatabaseThing): def __init__(self, connection): self connection = connection and instantiate that class instead of DatabaseThing for your tests
  • unit testing - When should I mock? - Stack Overflow
    Bonus mocking advice: mock the interfaces that are unstable or unknown Avoid constantly rewriting tests by mocking interfaces that are under active development or even hypothetical Mocking can facilitate a proof-of-concept In summary, if your tests can run quickly, consistently, and together in parallel, you're doing a good job of mocking
  • unit testing - Why is it so bad to mock classes? - Stack Overflow
    Mocking classes (in contrast to mocking interfaces) is bad because the mock still has a real class in the background, it is inherited from, and it is possible that real implementation is executed during the test When you mock (or stub or whatever) an interface, there is no risk of having code executed you actually wanted to mock





中文字典-英文字典  2005-2009