英文字典,中文字典,查询,解释,review.php


英文字典中文字典51ZiDian.com



中文字典辞典   英文字典 a   b   c   d   e   f   g   h   i   j   k   l   m   n   o   p   q   r   s   t   u   v   w   x   y   z       


安装中文字典英文字典辞典工具!

安装中文字典英文字典辞典工具!










  • Should you use Fields or just Properties in C#?
    Refactoring a field to a property after-the-fact is a nightmare; requiring you to recompile all of the consumers Changing an automatic property to contain custom logic is a breeze If there's even a slight chance of the code seeing refactor, it's going to be a lot less work if you just use properties from the onset
  • Correct usage of Property vs Field vs Function in C#
    In context, the field represents the latest version of a beneficiary object that is about to be created, and I want this variable to represent its latest possible version considering whatever is inside those public properties
  • Usage of private properties in C# vs fields
    Fields may need to be public for interop and making them public can be useful in some optimization scenarios (using structs where any value is a valid state, in particular taking advantage of C# 7 2 ref semantics) Properties might not be for exposing fields, some initialize lazily, some delegate to another object, or some other stuff, I remember a case where I had to implement a property as a
  • c# - Is it bad practice to use public fields? - Software Engineering . . .
    In general, yes, using public fields instead of properties is a bad practice The NET framework by and large assumes that you will use properties instead of public fields For example, databinding looks up properties by name: tbLastName DataBindings Add("Text", person, "LastName"); textbox binding Here are some things you can easily do with properties but not with fields: You can add
  • c# - Using a private auto-implemented property vs. a private field . . .
    Using a private auto-implemented property vs a private field Ask Question Asked 9 years, 8 months ago Modified 9 years, 8 months ago
  • c# - Private variable vs property? - Software Engineering Stack Exchange
    I would take it a step further, and bring it to 3 cases Although there are variations on each, this is the rules I use the majority of the time when C# programming In case 2 3, always go to the Property Accessor (not the field variable) And in case 1, you are saved from even having to make this choice 1 ) Immutable property (passed in to constructor, or created at construction time) In
  • . NET Properties - Use Private Set or ReadOnly Property?
    An update for those reading this answer in 2016 C# 6 0 has introduced readonly auto-properties, which allow you to have a readonly property without a backing field: public string Name { get; } If you don't want a mutable property, that's the preferred syntax now
  • c# - Is there a programming term that means property or field . . .
    Auto properties (which were not part of the C# language before version 3 0) create an invisible private field under the hood, but it is still a field which stores the value The more general, language independent term from OO modeling is member variable You can use that, if you prefer a more generic term than "field"


















中文字典-英文字典  2005-2009