英文字典中文字典


英文字典中文字典51ZiDian.com



中文字典辞典   英文字典 a   b   c   d   e   f   g   h   i   j   k   l   m   n   o   p   q   r   s   t   u   v   w   x   y   z       







请输入英文单字，中文词皆可：


请选择你想看的字典辞典：
单词字典翻译
Peano查看　Peano　在百度字典中的解释百度英翻中〔查看〕
Peano查看　Peano　在Google字典中的解释Google英翻中〔查看〕
Peano查看　Peano　在Yahoo字典中的解释Yahoo英翻中〔查看〕

安装中文字典英文字典查询工具!


中文字典英文字典工具:
选择颜色:
输入中英文单字

































































英文字典中文字典相关资料:


  • peano axioms - Definition of Natural Numbers which gives rigorous . . .
    So I know the first order theory that is Peano Arithmetic (just to ensure we are on the same page, it is a first order theory with signature $\{0, S, +, \cdot, = \}$ with the axioms: (i) All axioms from theory of pure equality, (ii) Zero and Successor Axiom (iii) 2 axioms on defining $+$ (iv) 2 axioms on defining $\cdot$ and (v) Induction
  • Peanos Axioms: Mathematical Philosophy - Mathematics Stack Exchange
    Dedekind and Peano, in the late 19th century set out to identify their essential properties from which, it was hoped, all others could be derived So successful were they in this regard, that, for all practical purposes, Peano's Axioms have come to define the natural numbers
  • Why do we take the axiom of induction for natural numbers (Peano . . .
    The Peano axioms Wikipedia page (currently) says as much It says the axiom of induction can be interpreted (in the context of Peano Axioms) as: If K is a set such that: 1 0 is in K, and 2 for every natural number n, n being in K implies that S(n) is in K, then K contains every natural number
  • calculus - Taylors Theorem with Peanos Form of Remainder . . .
    The Peano's form has very minimal assumptions and the approach in your answer can't really be used to prove it $\endgroup$ – Paramanand Singh ♦ Commented Jun 7, 2018 at 0:31
  • Do Peano axioms uniquely characterize the natural numbers?
    It depends what you mean by "Peano axioms" M Winter's answer assumes you mean the first-order Peano axioms By the compactness theorem, no infinite structure can ever be captured up to isomorphism by a first-order theory, and no countable rigid structure (like $\mathbb{N}$) can ever be captured up to isomorphism amongst countable structures by a first-order theory
  • Counting numbers vs Natural numbers; Peano Axioms
    The Peano axioms (and their modern first-order successor, Peano Arithmetic) were somewhat successful in that, but nonetheless the crowning achievement of the whole program turned out to be a negative result: Gödel's Incompleteness Theorem tells us that every reasonable formal system for proving things about the integers will be incomplete
  • What is the Peano definition of subtraction?
    Calculating the integer quotient and remainder in Peano arithmetic isn't hard The quotient is:
  • proof explanation - Are the Inductive Axiom and the Well ordering . . .
    Peano had come before FOL (first-order logic) was clearly elucidated, so he did not even realize this problem with his axiomatization of $ℕ$ Similarly, the well-ordering principle that your class is talking about is also about sets, so again it is useless without set-existence axioms
  • Peano Axioms - Is the induction axiom too much? [duplicate]
    In chapter 2 of Terence Tao's Analysis, Tao goes over the axiomatic formulation of the natural numbers (Peano axioms) He explained the first four axioms: Axiom 2 1 $0$ is a natural number Axiom





中文字典-英文字典  2005-2009