英文字典中文字典


英文字典中文字典51ZiDian.com



中文字典辞典   英文字典 a   b   c   d   e   f   g   h   i   j   k   l   m   n   o   p   q   r   s   t   u   v   w   x   y   z       







请输入英文单字，中文词皆可：


请选择你想看的字典辞典：
单词字典翻译
781930查看　781930　在百度字典中的解释百度英翻中〔查看〕
781930查看　781930　在Google字典中的解释Google英翻中〔查看〕
781930查看　781930　在Yahoo字典中的解释Yahoo英翻中〔查看〕

安装中文字典英文字典查询工具!


中文字典英文字典工具:
选择颜色:
输入中英文单字

































































英文字典中文字典相关资料:


  • Gladstone Ports Corporation Class Action - Litigation Capital Management
    LCM is funding a class action on behalf of commercial fishermen against Gladstone Ports Corporation for losses alleged to result from the large-scale contamination of the Gladstone harbour and surrounding waters from toxic dredge spill in 2011-12 This class action is being brought in the Supreme Court of Queensland and…
  • Queensland Supreme Court confirms legality of litigation funding . . .
    On 13 September 2019, the Queensland Supreme Court handed down a decision in Murphy Operator Ors v Gladstone Ports Corporation Anor (No 4) [2019] QSC 228 (Gladstone Ports decision) The Court found that the litigation funding agreements in play in that case were not, by reason of the 17 th century torts of maintenance (supporting litigation without an interest) or champerty (maintaining
  • Gladstone Ports - William Roberts Lawyers
    The class action is open to all persons who, during the period of 6 September 2011 to 18 June 2021, suffered loss and damage as the result of the decline in the quality of saleable fish (including various species) in the relevant affected waters (as defined in the Plaintiffs’ pleading) as the result of the dredging of the Gladstone port
  • SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND - level27chambers. com. au
    [3] The action, which is brought pursuant to Part 13A of the Civil Proceedings Act 2011 (Qld) (‘Civil Proceedings Act’) is known as the Gladstone Port Fisheries Class Action By application filed 16 November 2018, the defendant seeks security for costs and further discovery of documents Security for Costs
  • Court of Appeal upholds declaration that funding agreement is valid
    It is alleged in the class action that the defendant, Gladstone Ports Corporation Limited (GPC), is responsible for the classes’ losses resulting from the contamination to the waters where they
  • Gladstone Port Dredging Class Action
    Gladstone Port Dredging Class Action – Update 27 June 2021 Hi Y’all, You’ve all seen the movie “The Castle” where Dale Kerrigan goes off to the High Court in Canberra to try and save his house Well on 25 June 2021, the legal team representing all of you went off to the same High Court in Canberra to save this case (the Champerty issue)
  • Australia – Gladstone Ports Corporation Limited V Murphy Operator Pty . . .
    The appeal arose from representative proceedings brought by fishing and processing businesses in Gladstone (Plaintiffs), against the Gladstone Ports Corporation (GPC) for the collapse of the fishing industry following GPC's controversial Gladstone Port expansion project in 2011 The class action is being funded by litigation funder Litigation
  • $60m’ twist in fishing industry’s legal fight against port authority
    The class action case against Gladstone Ports Corporation by commercial fishermen and associated businesses has taken a $60 million twist It comes as the lawsuit, involving the government-owned
  • Queensland auditor refers state-owned business to corporate watchdog . . .
    Queensland's auditor-general raises concerns about termination payouts and a blowout in legal fees at Gladstone Ports Corporation in a report saying the government-owned business has been referred
  • Gladstone Ports Corporation Limited-v-Murphy Operator Pty-Ltd Ors 2020 . . .
    Where the appellant dredged waterways, excavated soil, and placed the materials dredged or excavated into various other places around the port of Gladstone – where the first, second and third respondents are plaintiffs in a class action brought pursuant to Part 13A of the Civil Proceedings Act 2011 (Qld) – where the respondents allege that, due to the appellant’s negligence and failure
  • Murphy Operator v Gladstone Ports Corporation (No 4) [2019] QSC 228
    The case concerned a class action commenced by a number of commercial fishing businesses who claim to have suffered loss as a result of pollution caused by certain works at the Port of Gladstone The plaintiffs and group members in the proceeding had entered into typical commercial litigation funding agreements which provided for the funder to
  • LCM | High Court refuses to hear GPC’s challenge to enforceability of . . .
    The Queensland Court of Appeal has unanimously dismissed an appeal which sought to invalidate the third party funding arrangements in the Gladstone Fisheries class action The court upheld a declaration made at first instance that the funding agreements could not be challenged on public policy grounds as argued by the defendant, Gladstone Ports Corporation Limited (GPC)





中文字典-英文字典  2005-2009